Developer Wharfe Bridge plans to appeal the decision to refuse planning permission to build 60 new homes on the site of the old cattle market. Wharfe Bridge claims that not only do the proposals improve the flooding situation for the town, they also provide economic and social benefits to the community that can’t be met by an alternative scheme.
Leeds City Council (LCC) has rejected a planning application by developer Wharfe Bridge to build 60 townhouses, and apartments on the site of the former Bridge End Cattle Market in Otley. Despite the economic positives that would have been brought to Otley should this application have been approved, LCC has insisted that the objection in principle from the Environment Agency (EA) states that flooding is far too great an issue to allow the development to be approved. Wharfe Bridge will be appealing the decision by LCC and will continue to work with its project designers in pursuit of making the development a reality.
With the government’s recent research stating there is a lack of housing in the UK; Wharfe Bridge had proposed to build 25% of the development specifically designed as affordable housing for local people.
From the outset flooding has been acknowledged as a high priority. Wharfe Bridge worked closely with specialist flood risk consultants JBA Consulting, to guarantee that appropriate flood risk mitigation measures would be incorporated into the development, ensuring that not only the development itself would be protected, but also would reduce flood risk to a nearby residential area. Raising of the site, to above the ‘100 year’ flood level would have effectively blocked an existing flood route that currently conveys water across the site towards Billams Hill and Farnley Lane. Further mitigation works, in the form of lowering ground levels between the river and the development site, would have compensated for the potential impacts of the development, preventing increases in the river flood level. The raising of the site levels would ensure that the development area would no longer sit in the ‘High Probability’ Flood Zone 3. Discharges of surface water from the site would also be controlled to maintain existing rates, using storage within the drainage system, to prevent an increase in flood risk.
The council have raised highlighted traffic and highways as an issue, however the development’s highways scheme was produced in consultation with LCC and clearly showed that its implementation would improve safety in the area.
Bill Hudson, of Wharfe Bridge says: “We are of course disappointed that planning permission for this development has been refused, however some serious time, thought and experience has gone into this project and we are confident that once we can further demonstrate that the flooding has been properly addressed and provides a benefit far beyond the development itself, the appeal will be successful.”
The scheme’s elements would have included a crescent to the south of the site that balances and complements Bridge Avenue.
Links to coverage in the Wharfedale Observer and the Bradford Telegraph and Argus.


Recent Comments